Tried expressing my concerns on Asics homepage.Each time (three times total) I wrote something negative, my comments were "moderated", in other words deleted.
To test their page I wrote, "Asics are the best, I love them!" Low and behold it was posted immediately. The heel pockets on Nimbus 17s and Cumulus 17s wore through after only 30 miles on each pair and caused horrible blisters. Returned both to Asics, after review was told "no defect found, normal wear". Also, odd thing about Asics customer service, why are there only kids working the phones who follow their scripts verbatim?
Are there no adults there who can make sound rational decision? Have run thousands of miles in Nike and NB, never a problem with either brand. Asics message to consumer, be ready to spend $140+ per pair every 30 miles.
See attached letter and pictures.Thanks.
This person wrote the review because of "poor customer service, bad quality, warranty or lack thereof " of asics gel-nimbus 17 sneakers from Asics and attached photo s. Reviewer claimed that he or she lost $250 and wants Asics to "accept responsibility for the problem, a refund would be nice".
The most disappointing in user's experience was asics does not stand behind their products like nike and nb do, quality of the shoes and warranty conditions for manufacturers defect. Author liked the most cushioning of the nimbus 17s. The author asks this business to immediately contact him/ her to briefly discuss his/ her negative experience with the company.
We collected other reviews about products and/or services offered by Asics for you to read. This information may help you with your purchase decision.